Basic Data

  • Type of industry: : Self driving vehicles
  • Website http://rdmgroup.co.uk/
  • Focus pilot: design of AV taking into account privacy, safety and inclusiveness
  • More details on pilot results: Report RDM

The company

Autonomous or ‘self-driving’ vehicles promise many safety, environmental and congestion-reducing benefits for future transport. In recent years the first steps have been made towards producing and marketing autonomous vehicles. In this pilot we work with the RDM Group, an SME based in Coventry, UK, that produces small low-speed self-driving pods. These are envisioned as being deployed for the ‘last mile’ of a journey, such as between a railway station and the final destination. They also might be used in shopping malls, university campuses, airports, or for parcel delivery.
The company RDM is part of several consortia that receive funding from Innovate UK, a body that distributes government funds for research. Amongst the project members are also Jaguar Land Rover and Milton Keynes Council. Furthermore, RDM has been involved in UK research council funded projects on automated cars.

 

Focus of the pilot 

• How should the trials of automated vehicles on public roads should be conducted, and how can other road-users be given informed expectations about their behaviour?
• How can the technology be designed in a way that responsibly takes account of privacy and data-use in the future while maintaining its own and its clients’ commercial freedom?
• How do we understand the limitations imposed by spaces in which this technology is to be deployed?

Interview

The following interviews with  Simon Brewerton, CTO of RDM,  are about 2 issues:

  • Safety
  • Ethical issues and stakeholder engagement

‘ As part of our project work that we’ve done with the PRISMA project, we’ve been audited effectively against certain criteria that were generated from the PRISMA project, to see how responsible our innovation is at RDM’ 

 

 

Pilot: Recommendations 

Our key advice is:

  • the civic role of the technology is strong and should be developed further
  • the commercial element is innovative but requires strong backing from democratic institutions in order to be carried out in the public sphere (through arguments relating to congestion, pollution, and safety).

Wit respect to the questions mentioned above:

  •  How should the trials of automated vehicles on public roads should be conducted, and how can other road-users be given informed expectations about their behaviour?
    We have advised that the key value at stake is the involvement of a diversity of stakeholders. Stakeholders include a wide range of actors: those who are involved in financing, designing, manufacturing, selling and marketing the product; users who would benefit from the product; businesses that would benefit from the product; individuals or businesses who are sceptical about the product or who believe they may lose out were it implemented. These groups may overlap. Stakeholders also include industry organisations, NGOs, and local government representatives. The more diverse the actors involved in the development of the product from the outset, the more likely it is that bottleneck issues will be addressed before the technology is too expensive to change. For example, trial participants may be sought from different populations with a deliberate goal of including those who may not naturally sign up to the process, such as the elderly. More broadly, trials should be understood to be a part of a general process in which different elements of the social group that will use the technology are ultimately consulted.
  • How  can the technology be designed in a way that responsibly takes account of privacy and data-use in the future while maintaining its own and its clients’ commercial freedom?
    RDM’s operating model involves raising revenue by brokering the data provided by users and the offers made by retailers to pod passengers. This raises the issue of informed consent to the use of this data and the related issue of the various possible uses of data beyond the actual or reasonable expectations of the individual. For instance, businesses may solicit preferable routes on the basis of statistically likely interest on the part of travellers. The RDM technology is being designed from the outset on the model of ‘service in exchange for data’. The RDM project is also innovative in facilitating commercial purchases of data it collects.Our advice in this area is that the technology should be developed with a clear eye on the recent debates surrounding the existing economic model of information exchange. This will enable the technology not just to avoid the kind of controversy surrounding Facebook in its dealings with Cambridge Analytica, but moreover to show leadership in forming fair kinds of data exchange. This begins with systems aimed at establishing informed consent and personal control of data, a process that is now more regulated under the General Data Protection Regulation, so that trading of data to third parties is limited, and that individuals are able easily to extract and remove the information held about them. Since new technologies are often held to higher standards it will be of benefit to the deployment to seek to be leaders in this area by providing separation between users’ data in storage thereby increasing cybersecurity; and by implementing protocols that provide for the use of anonymization techniques as extensively as possible.
  • How do we understand the limitations imposed by spaces in which this technology is to be deployed?
    The system might be conceived of on the model of public transport or on the model of a taxi service – or something in between. Such an understanding makes a difference to the permissions and restrictions that the public will be willing to place upon the system. The way the vehicle interacts with commercial retail is a salient instance of this issue. It is conceivable, for example, that retailers could vie for customers by paying for a preferred route that brings passengers to their premises. Furthermore, the possible social benefits that the technology could provide (e.g., through agreements with charities supporting blind people, aid for those living in sheltered housing for elderly, traffic calming schemes, park & ride systems) might similarly alter its status in this regard by playing a role in civic development.